🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."